This article talks about how female executives are twice as likely to depart from their jobs voluntary or involuntary compared to their male counterparts. This stat is a major factor when it comes to women being able to take over top positions in company's. It is also probably why women have not received the same amount of attention when it comes to hiring them to top potions. "Becker-Blease said research has shown that women are more likely to leave a job due to domestic or social responsibilities than men, which could explain the higher voluntary departure rate." This makes employers job very hard when knowing that women might get up and leave earlier than any man and it affects their ability to break the labyrinth.
“Recent research offers some intriguing evidence suggesting that while the market may seem to perceive women as less capable business leaders, the disparity isn’t really about gender, but about the experience those women bring to the table,” Becker-Blease said. This quote shows that in order for women to really break through the labyrinth they need to find away to become more experienced in their fields whether that i through more education or through more work in their positions.
The other main point that the article brings up is that women really do benefit from other women in top positions within the company. My opinion for this is that women that are shown to do well within the company allows the company to put more trust in them because like the article states they are shown to have more experience. The more experience anyone shows whether it is a man or a women definitely benefits the gender within the company. Why do you think women benefit more when women control top positions. Also do you think that companies are being more discriminatory towards women because of their type of leadership skills or do you think it has to do with their level of experience.
Posted By: Jim Link